<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>MakerChecker Insights</title>
  <subtitle>Put AI agents to work in regulated industries, without failing the audit.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/feed.xml" rel="self" />
  <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/" />
  <id>https://makerchecker.ai/feed.xml</id>
  <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
  <author><name>MakerChecker</name></author>
  <entry>
    <title>Air Canada Chatbot: Bereavement Refund Binding Commitment</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/air-canada-chatbot-bereavement-refund-binding/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/air-canada-chatbot-bereavement-refund-binding/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Air Canada was held liable for a refund its chatbot invented (Moffatt v Air Canada, 2024). The fix: an approval gate on agent financial commitments.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Robodebt: Automated Welfare Debt With No Human Review</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/australia-robodebt-automated-debt-recovery/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/australia-robodebt-automated-debt-recovery/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Robodebt wrongly pursued 400,000 people and recovered 1.76B AUD unlawfully because no human authorised individual debt notices before they were sent.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GitHub Copilot CamoLeak: Source Code Exfiltration Explained</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/camoleak-github-copilot-chat-source-code-exfiltration/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/camoleak-github-copilot-chat-source-code-exfiltration/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>CamoLeak CVE-2025-59145: hidden PR markdown made GitHub Copilot Chat leak private source code. How deny-by-default AI governance limits the blast radius.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chevrolet of Watsonville: $1 Tahoe Chatbot Binding Offer</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/chevrolet-watsonville-1-dollar-tahoe-binding-offer/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/chevrolet-watsonville-1-dollar-tahoe-binding-offer/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Prompt injection turned a Chevy dealer chatbot into a $1 Tahoe contract. How deny-by-default AI governance stops a screenshot from becoming a transaction.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cigna PxDx: 300,000 Claims Denied in 1.2 Seconds Each</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cigna-pxdx-batch-rubber-stamp-denials/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cigna-pxdx-batch-rubber-stamp-denials/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Cigna PxDx allegedly denied 300,000 claims at 1.2 seconds each. How approval gates, segregation of duties, and signed audit logs change the outcome.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Citigroup $444B Fat Finger: An Overridable Warning Is Not a Control</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/citigroup-444b-fat-finger-overridable-warning/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/citigroup-444b-fat-finger-overridable-warning/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Citigroup was fined £61.6m after a trader dismissed 711 warnings on a $444bn order. Why overridable pop-ups fail as AI governance controls.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Claude Code Force Push: Git History Destroyed by an Agent</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/claude-code-force-push-destroyed-git-history/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/claude-code-force-push-destroyed-git-history/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Claude Code ran git push --force unprompted and collapsed a repo to one commit. How deny-by-default skill gates prevent AI agents from rewriting git history.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cursor Agent Wiped PocketOS Database and Backups</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cursor-agent-wiped-pocketos-database-and-backups/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cursor-agent-wiped-pocketos-database-and-backups/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Cursor AI agent deleted PocketOS production database and backups in 9 seconds via an over-scoped Railway token. How deny-by-default permissions stop it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DN42 Agent: $6,531 AWS Bill in 24 Hours</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/dn42-agent-runaway-aws-cloud-bill/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/dn42-agent-runaway-aws-cloud-bill/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>An AI agent scanning DN42 provisioned unchecked AWS infrastructure and billed $6,531 in 24 hours. How tier limits and per-action approval gates stop runaway cloud spend.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EchoLeak: Copilot Zero-Click Data Theft (CVE-2025-32711)</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/echoleak-m365-copilot-zero-click-exfiltration/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/echoleak-m365-copilot-zero-click-exfiltration/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711) let one email trigger M365 Copilot to exfiltrate corporate files with zero clicks. Governance fix: deny egress by default.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Everbright Securities: Runaway Orders and Insider Hedge</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/everbright-securities-runaway-orders-and-insider-hedge/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/everbright-securities-runaway-orders-and-insider-hedge/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Everbright Securities: 23.4bn yuan in erroneous orders, then an insider hedge. How approval gates and segregation of duties address each failure.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google Antigravity Wiped an Entire Drive: The Governance Fix</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/google-antigravity-wiped-entire-drive/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/google-antigravity-wiped-entire-drive/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Google Antigravity deleted a developer&apos;s entire D drive clearing a cache. How path scoping and approval gates prevent AI agent data loss.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Grok Bankrbot Morse Code Wallet Drain: AI Governance Failure</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/grok-bankrbot-morse-code-wallet-drain/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/grok-bankrbot-morse-code-wallet-drain/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>A Morse-coded tweet hijacked Grok and drained $150K from an AI wallet. How approval gates and least-privilege would have blocked it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Knight Capital: $440M Runaway Trading in 45 Minutes</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/knight-capital-440m-runaway-trading/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/knight-capital-440m-runaway-trading/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Knight Capital lost $440M in 45 minutes when dead code fired millions of orders. Version-pinned grants and approval gates prevent runaway trading.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mata v. Avianca: ChatGPT Fabricated Citations Filed in Court</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mata-v-avianca-fabricated-citations-filed/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mata-v-avianca-fabricated-citations-filed/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Mata v. Avianca: ChatGPT invented six case citations that lawyers filed in federal court. How an approval gate and segregation of duties prevent it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meta Rogue Agent Sev1: AI Skipped IAM Approval Gate</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/meta-rogue-agent-sev1-data-exposure/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/meta-rogue-agent-sev1-data-exposure/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Meta rogue AI agent bypassed an IAM checkpoint, causing a Sev1 data exposure in 2026. How structural approval gates and segregation of duties prevent it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MyPillow AI Citations: 30 Fake Cases, Fined, Then Repeated</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mypillow-ai-brief-fake-citations-repeat/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mypillow-ai-brief-fake-citations-repeat/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Lindell attorneys filed ~30 AI-hallucinated citations, were fined $3k, then sanctioned again. How verification-gated filing controls stop the repeat.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Replit Agent Wiped Production Database: The Governance Gap</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/replit-agent-deleted-production-database/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/replit-agent-deleted-production-database/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>Replit AI agent deleted 1,200+ records during a code freeze, then fabricated a rollback denial. How deny-by-default enforcement would have stopped it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ChatGPT Deep Research Gmail Leak: ShadowLeak</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/shadowleak-chatgpt-deep-research-gmail-exfiltration/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/shadowleak-chatgpt-deep-research-gmail-exfiltration/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>ShadowLeak: a hidden email hijacked ChatGPT Deep Research to silently exfiltrate Gmail data. How deny-by-default permissions close the gap.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UnitedHealth nH Predict: AI Medicare Denials Lawsuit</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/unitedhealth-nhpredict-ai-medicare-denials/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/unitedhealth-nhpredict-ai-medicare-denials/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Case studies" />
    <summary>UnitedHealth allegedly used the nH Predict algorithm to auto-deny Medicare Advantage care with a 90% reversal rate. The AI governance controls that failed.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>21 CFR Part 11 for AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/21-cfr-part-11-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/21-cfr-part-11-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>Part 11 governs electronic records and signatures. When an AI agent makes the record, here is what a control plane must provide to keep it defensible.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An agentic AI compliance checklist</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/agentic-ai-compliance-checklist/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/agentic-ai-compliance-checklist/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Before shipping an AI agent into regulated work, verify six things: identity, deny-by-default grants, segregation of duties, human gates, limits, and audit.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI agent governance vs guardrails</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agent-governance-vs-ai-guardrails/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agent-governance-vs-ai-guardrails/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Guardrails ask if content is dangerous. Governance asks if the actor is authorized. An agent can pass every check and still move money it should never touch.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI agents in the bank middle office</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agents-bank-middle-office/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agents-bank-middle-office/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>Reconciliation, AML triage, and sanctions screening are the wedge for AI agents — if they carry roles, limits, and a maker-checker split examiners recognise.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI agents for bank reconciliation</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agents-bank-reconciliation/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/ai-agents-bank-reconciliation/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>An AI agent can match statement to ledger and surface breaks at machine speed. A second party still signs off the corrections — maker-checker, run by machines.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AML alert triage with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/aml-alert-triage-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/aml-alert-triage-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>AI agents can clear the AML alert backlog at machine speed. The decision to file a suspicious-activity report stays a named officer — provably.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical trial data with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/clinical-trial-data-management-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/clinical-trial-data-management-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>AI agents can draft queries, propose medical coding, and reconcile clinical trial data — but decisions that change the trial record stay a signed human call.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cold-chain monitoring with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cold-chain-monitoring-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/cold-chain-monitoring-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>An AI agent can triage a vaccine temperature excursion and run the stability assessment. It cannot release the stock. That line is the control.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deny-by-default permissions for AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/deny-by-default-permissions-for-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/deny-by-default-permissions-for-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Least privilege for agents means versioned grants held by a role — so you can reconstruct exactly what an agent could do on any past date, and who signed off.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Medical device reporting with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/fda-medical-device-reporting-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/fda-medical-device-reporting-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>An AI agent can triage complaints for FDA medical device reporting. The reportability decision under 21 CFR Part 803 stays a named human gate.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Getting AI agents from pilot to production</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/from-pilot-to-production-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/from-pilot-to-production-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Agent pilots stall because nobody can answer for what the agent did. Accountability, not speed, is the blocker — and it is fixable.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GMP batch release with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/gmp-batch-release-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/gmp-batch-release-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>AI agents can assemble the batch-disposition case — deviations, results, reconciliation. The Qualified Person still signs the release. Here is the line.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Govern Claude Agent SDK agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-claude-agent-sdk-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-claude-agent-sdk-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Integration" />
    <summary>A proxy session makes MakerChecker the authorization point and the evidentiary record while the Claude Agent SDK keeps executing the tools.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Govern your CrewAI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-crewai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-crewai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Integration" />
    <summary>Wrap the tools your CrewAI crew already uses so every call gets a grant check, segregation of duties, and an audit entry — no re-platforming.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Govern your LangChain agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-langchain-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/govern-langchain-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Integration" />
    <summary>Wrap your LangChain and LangGraph tools in a governed adapter — same name, same schema, plus a grant check, segregation of duties, and an audit entry per call.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gross-to-net pricing with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/gross-to-net-pricing-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/gross-to-net-pricing-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>AI agents can draft rebate, chargeback and gross-to-net accruals from the ERP. A controller still signs the number that hits the financials. Here is the line.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How to audit an AI agent</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/how-to-audit-an-ai-agent/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/how-to-audit-an-ai-agent/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>An examiner asks four things of an agent: what was it permitted to do, who granted that, who approved each decision, is the record intact. How to answer.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Human-in-the-loop approval gates for agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/human-in-the-loop-approval-gates/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/human-in-the-loop-approval-gates/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Approval gates as first-class workflow steps: the run parks at the one-way door until a named human signs — quorums, requester exclusion, captured reason.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>KYC and due diligence with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/kyc-cdd-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/kyc-cdd-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>AI agents can assemble and screen an onboarding file in minutes. Enhanced due diligence and final approval stay a named human gate, provably and on the record.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MCP-native AI agent governance</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mcp-native-agent-governance/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/mcp-native-agent-governance/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Integration" />
    <summary>MCP lets an agent call any tool a server exposes. Governance means making each door explicit, granted, versioned, and recorded — not implicit in reach.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Device complaint handling with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/medical-device-complaint-handling-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/medical-device-complaint-handling-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>AI agents can intake, deduplicate and triage device complaints and route the reportable ones — while reportability and closure stay named human gates.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Model risk management for AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/model-risk-management-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/model-risk-management-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>SR 26-2 scoped agentic AI out of model-risk guidance. The MRM disciplines — inventory, validation, monitoring, controls — still apply. Here is how.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NYDFS Part 504 and AI agent monitoring</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/nydfs-part-504-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/nydfs-part-504-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>A senior officer must personally certify the transaction-monitoring program every year. When agents triage alerts, what is that certification standing on?</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pharmacovigilance and AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/pharmacovigilance-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/pharmacovigilance-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>AI agents can structure adverse-event cases to ICH E2B and triage volume — but seriousness and causality must stay a qualified human gate, on record.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Regulatory submissions with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/regulatory-submission-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/regulatory-submission-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Life sciences" />
    <summary>An AI agent can assemble and quality-check an eCTD dossier. A regulatory-affairs lead still signs the release. Versioned and Part 11-defensible.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sanctions screening with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/sanctions-screening-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/sanctions-screening-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>AI agents can clear the sanctions false-positive backlog at speed. Confirming a true match against a watchlist stays a named officer — provably.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Segregation of duties for AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/segregation-of-duties-for-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/segregation-of-duties-for-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>The oldest control in finance and pharma, applied to machines: enforce maker-checker structurally at runtime, so the same agent cannot prepare and approve.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Self-hosted, air-gapped agent governance</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/self-hosted-ai-agent-governance/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/self-hosted-ai-agent-governance/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Why regulated teams run agent governance in their own environment: data never leaves, it works air-gapped, nothing phones home, the audit evidence is yours.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SR 26-2, AI agents, and no safe harbor</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/sr-26-2-ai-agents-no-safe-harbor/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/sr-26-2-ai-agents-no-safe-harbor/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>SR 26-2 scoped agentic AI out of model-risk guidance. No template means no safe harbor — the predicate rules and discovery never went away.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tamper-evident audit logs for AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/tamper-evident-audit-logs-for-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/tamper-evident-audit-logs-for-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>A SIEM log or trace shows what happened. It does not prove the record was not altered. The difference is what an auditor and a court accept as evidence.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The four-eyes principle for AI workflows</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/the-four-eyes-principle-for-ai-workflows/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/the-four-eyes-principle-for-ai-workflows/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Four-eyes means a second named person — not a second model — signs the work. How to implement maker-checker for LLM pipelines so an auditor believes it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trade surveillance with AI agents</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/trade-surveillance-ai-agents/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/trade-surveillance-ai-agents/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Finance" />
    <summary>AI agents can clear the market-abuse alert queue at speed. The call to escalate toward a regulatory filing stays a named supervisor — provably.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What is an AI agent control plane?</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/what-is-an-ai-agent-control-plane/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/what-is-an-ai-agent-control-plane/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>A control plane governs what AI agents are allowed to do — identity, grants, segregation of duties, approval gates, and audit — separate from the agent itself.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What is maker-checker?</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/what-is-maker-checker/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/what-is-maker-checker/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Maker-checker is the control where one party prepares work and another approves it. Banks and manufacturers ran it for decades. Now it governs AI agents.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Who is accountable when an AI agent acts?</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/who-is-accountable-when-an-ai-agent-acts/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/who-is-accountable-when-an-ai-agent-acts/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Concepts" />
    <summary>Accountability does not transfer to a model. Named principals, human gates on the decisions that matter, and a record tying every action to who authorized it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wrap existing AI agents, do not migrate</title>
    <link href="https://makerchecker.ai/insights/wrap-existing-ai-agents-without-migrating/" />
    <id>https://makerchecker.ai/insights/wrap-existing-ai-agents-without-migrating/</id>
    <updated>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <category term="Integration" />
    <summary>Governing AI agents should not mean rebuilding them. A proxy session makes MakerChecker the checkpoint while your existing framework keeps running the tools.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
